Authority, Intellectual Networks and Politics in the Canonization of Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī and Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Dec 20, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2025.15.2.27-59
Keywords:
Canonization; Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī; Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān; Personal Authority; Intellectual networks; Political Patronage.

Main Article Content

Kiki Adnan Muzaki
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Ahmad Fudhaili
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Habil Abyad
Universitas PTIQ Jakarta
Faisal Mahmoud Adam
University of The Holy Quran and Islamic Sciences

Abstract

This study examines the canonization process of Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī and Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān, considering that both possess similar critical authority and methodology yet hold differing reputations. Employing a qualitative method with a historical-comparative approach, the study draws upon classical sources on tarājim al-ruwwāt, historiography, and al-jarḥ wa al-ta‘dīl, as well as relevant contemporary academic scholarship. The findings demonstrate that al-Bukhārī’s methodological superiority provided a strong foundation for the widespread acceptance of his work. However, the canonical status of Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī did not emerge solely from methodological precision and personal authority, but also from layered social processes, including traditions of scholarly criticism and defense, networks of knowledge transmission, and political as well as institutional support. By contrast, Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān who has comparable methodical and personal authority   did not undergo the same social and historical trajectory, so that it does have the same reputation as al-Bukhari. This study fills an analytical gap in ḥadīth studies by demonstrating that the divergent historical trajectories of these two collections were not rooted in methodological disparities only, but also in distinct socio-historical contexts, scholarly networks, and political patronage. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Adnan Muzaki, K., Ahmad Fudhaili, Habil Abyad, & Faisal Mahmoud Adam. (2025). Authority, Intellectual Networks and Politics in the Canonization of Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī and Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān. Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith, 15(2), 27–59. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2025.15.2.27-59
Issue
Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): DECEMBER
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

‘Abdah, Mājid Muḥammad. “Al-Intiqādāt Allatī Wujjihat li Manhaj al-Imām Ibn Ḥibbān wa Ṣāḥīḥih wa Munāqashatuhā.” Al-Ḥikmah 42 (2010): 145–204. http://search.mandumah.com/Record/147871.

‘Abdillah, Mawfiq Ibn. “Al-Mustakhraj Nash’atuhā Wa Taṭawwuruhā.” Journal of Ummul Qurā University 12, no. 19 (2000): 187–233.

‘Ammār (Ibn), Shams al-Dīn. Miftāḥ al-Sa‘īdīyah fī Sharḥ al-Alfiyah al-Ḥadīthīyah. Edited by Shādī b. Muḥammad. 1st ed. Ṣan‘ā: Markaz al-Nu‘mān, 2011.

‘Asqalānī (al), Abū al-Faḍl Aḥmad b. ‘Alī b. Ḥajar. Al-Nukat ‘alā Kitāb Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ. Edited by Rabī‘ b. al-Hādī. Madinah: ‘Imādat al-Baḥth al-‘Ilmī bi al-Jāmi‘ah al-Islāmīyah, 1984.

_______. Fatḥ al-Bārī fī Sharḥ Ṣaḥīh al-Bukhārī. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah, 1960.

_______. Lisān al-Mīzān. Edited by ‘Abd al-Fattāh Abū Ghuddah. Dār al-Bashā’ir al-Islāmīyah, 2002.

_______. Nuzhat al-Naẓr fī Tawḍīh Nukhbat al-Fikr fī Muṣṭalaḥ Ahl Athār. Edited by ‘Abdullāh al-Ruḥaylī. Riyāḍ: Maṭba‘at al-Safīr, 2001.

_______. Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb. Edited by Muḥammad ‘Awāmah. Suria: Dār al-Rashīd, 1986.

Aḥmad, ‘Amar. “Scholars of Hadith Methodology in Dealing with the Two Sahihs: The Criticized Hadith as a Model.” Islamiyyatu Al-Ma’rifat, no. 92 (April 2018): 49–85. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=awr&AN=132960457&site=ehost-live.

Anas (Ibn), Mālik. Al-Muwaṭṭa’. Edited by Muḥammad Muṣtāfā al-A‘ẓāmī. Abu Dhabi: Mu’assasat Zāyid b. Ṣulṭān, 2004.

Anderson, Earl R. “Defining The Canon.” PMLA. Vol. 116. Cambridge University Press, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1632/PMLA.2001.116.5.1442.

Azīz, Wafa Ibn ‘Abdul. “Al-Bukhaari’s Followers Approach in Narration Verses Whom They Described by Shiah in His Book ‘Al Jameh Al Saheeh’.” IUG Journal of Islamic Studies 28, no. 1 (January 2020): 263–98. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=awr&AN=141507284&site=ehost-live.

Baghdādī (al), Abū Bakr Aḥmad b. ‘Alī b. Tha>bit al-Khaṭīb. Al-Kifāyah fī ‘Ilm al-Riwāyah. Edited by al-Sūraqi and Ibrāhīm Ḥamdī. Madinah: al-Maktabah al-‘Ilmīyah, n.d.

Bāḥū, Abū Sufyān Muṣṭafā. Al-Aḥādīth Al-Muntaqadah fī al-Ṣaḥīḥayn. 1st ed. Thanta: Maktabah al-Ḍiyā’, 2005.

Bayḥaqī (al), Abū Bakr. Ma‘rifat al-Sunan wa al-Āthār. Edited by ‘Abd al-Mu‘ṭī. Vol. 1. Beirut: Dār Qutaybah, 1991.

Berg, Herbert. “Reviewed Work(s): The Canonization of Al-Bukhārī and Muslim: The Formation and Function of the Sunnī Ḥadīth Canon by Jonathan Brown.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 71, no. 3 (2008): 570–72. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40378812.

Bin Muhammad Yusoff, Muhammad Fawwaz. “The Authentication of Ḥadīth: Ibn Ḥibbān’s Introduction to His Ṣaḥīḥ.” Al-Masāq 32, no. 3 (September 2020): 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503110.2020.1712546.

Blenkinsopp, Joseph. Prophecy and Canon, A Contribution to the Study of Jewish Origins. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1986.

Brown, Jonathan. “Criticism of the Proto-Hadith Canon: Al-Dāraquṭnī’s Adjustment of the"Ṣaḥīḥayn".” Journal of Islamic Studies 28, no. 3 (2017): 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etx013.

_______. “The Canonization of Ibn Mâjah: Authenticity vs. Utility in the Formation of the Sunni Ḥadîth Canon.” Revue des mondes musulmans et de la Méditerranée 129 (2011): 129. https://doi.org/10.4000/remmm.7154.

_______. The Canonization of Al-Bukhārī and Muslim. Leiden: BRILL, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004158399.i-431.

Bukhārī (al), Muḥammad b. Ismā‘īl. Ṣaḥīh al-Bukhārī. Vol. 3. Damaskus: Dār Ibn Kathīr, 1993.

Dārimī (al), ‘Abdullāh. Sunan al-Dārimī. Edited by Ḥusayn Salīm. Saudi Arabia: Dār al-Mughnī, 2000.

Dāruquṭnī (al), ‘Alī b. ‘Amr. Al-Ilzāmāt wa al-Tatabbu‘. Edited by Muqbil b. Hādī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmīyah, 1985.

Davidson, Samuel. The Canon of The Bible: Its Formation, History, and Fluctuations. Third. London: C. Kegan Paul & Co., 1880.

Dhahabī (al), Muḥammad b. Aḥmad. Jam‘ al-Jawāmi‘. Edited by Mukhta>r Ibrāhīm. Egypt: al-Azhar, 2005.

_______. Mīzān Al-I‘tidāl fī Naqd al-Rijāl. Edited by ‘Ali Muḥammad al-Bajāwī. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah, 1963.

_______. Al-Kāshif fī Ma‘rifat man lahū Riwāyah fī al-Kutub al-Sittah. Edited by Muḥammad ‘Awāmah. Jeddah: Dār al-Qiblah, 1992.

_______. Siyar A‘lām al-Nubalā’. Edited by Shu‘ayb al-Arnā‘uṭ. 3rd ed. Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Risālah, 1985.

_______. Tārikh al-Islām wa Wafayāt al-Mashāhir wa al-A‘lām. Edited by Bashār ‘Awwād. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 2003.

Fāsī (al), ‘Alā’uddīn. Al-Iḥsān fī Taqrīb Ṣāḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān. Edited by Shu‘ayb al-Arna‘ūṭ. Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Risālah, 1993.

Fatkhi, Rifqi Muhammad. “Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān Dalam Al-Kutub Al-Sittah: Sebuah Tawaran Alteranatif.” Sekolah Pascasarjana UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, 2008.

Fawwaz, Muhammad, and Muhammad Yusoff. “A Ḥadīth Collection over the Generations: The Transmission of Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān.” Islamiyyat 42, no. 2 (December 1, 2020): 15–21. https://doi.org/10.17576/islamiyyat-2020-4202-02.

Fudhaili, Ahmad. “Metode ‘Āishah Dalam Kritik Hadis.” Sekolah Pascasarjana UIN Jakarta, 2009.

Ghassānī (al), Abū ‘Alī. Al-Tanbīh ‘alā al-Awhām al-Wāqi‘ah fī al-Musnad al-Ṣaḥīḥ li al-Bukhārī. Edited by Muḥammad Abu Faḍl. al-Dār al-Baiḍā: Maṭba‘at al-Najāḥ al-Jadīdah, 1998.

Ghawrī (al), Sayyid ‘Abd al-Majīd. Mu‘jam al-Muṣṭalaḥāt al-Ḥadīthīyah. Damaskus: Dār Ibn Kathīr, 2007.

Ḥanbalī (al), Muḥammad b. Rajab. Sharḥ ‘Ilal al-Tirmidhī. Edited by Hammām ‘Abd al-Raḥīm. Zarqā: Maktabat al-Manār, 1987.

Ḥibbān (Ibn), Abū Ḥātim Muḥammad. Al-Thiqāt. Edited by 1. Hyderabad: Dā’irat al-Ma‘ārif al-‘Uthmānīyah, 1973.

_______. Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān. Edited by Shu‘ayb al-Arna‘ūṭ. Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Risālah, 1988.

Ḥajawī (al), Muḥammad b. Ḥasan. Al-Difā‘ ‘an al-Ṣaḥīḥayn Difā‘ ‘an al-Islām. Edited by Muḥammad b. ‘Azūr. Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 2003.

Ḥajjāj (Ibn), Muslim. Ṣaḥih Muslim. Edited by Muḥammad Fu’a>d ‘Abd al-Bāqī’. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī, 1955.

Ḥanbal (Ibn), Aḥmad. Al-‘Ilal wa Ma‘rifat al-Rijāl. Edited by Muḥammad ‘Abbās. Riyāḍ: Dār al-Khānī, 2001.

Ḥāzimī (al), Abu Bakr. Shurūṭ al-A’immah al-Khamsah. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmīyah, 1984.

Ḥazm (Ibn), Muḥammad, and al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī. Juz’ fī al-Awhām allatī Waqa‘āt fī al-Ṣaḥīḥayn wa Muwaṭṭa’ Mālik. Edited by Badr al-‘Umrānī. 1st ed. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmīyah, 2002.

Hādī (al), Shamshuddīn b. ‘Abd. Al-Ṣārim al-Munkī fī al-Radd ‘ala> al-Subkī. Edited by ‘Uqayl b. Muḥammad. 1st ed. Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Rayyān, 2003.

Irmayanti. “Metode Ibn Khuzaymah Dan Ibn Ḥibbān Dalam Menentukan Kesahihan Hadis; Studi Komparatif Terhadap Kitab Ṣaḥīh Ibn Khuzaymah Dan Kitab Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān.” Pascasarjana Institut Ilmu Al-Qur’an, 2015.

Jawzī (al), Jamāl al-Dīn Ibn. Al-Mawḍū‘āt. Edited by ‘Abd al-Raḥmān. Madinah: al-Maktabah al-Salafīyah, 1966.

Kamāl, ‘Ālī Shīkūsh. “Ārā Ibn Ḥibbān Al-Ḥadīthiyyah Min Khilāl Kitābih Al-Ṣaḥīḥ.” Universitas Batna, Algeria, 2007.

Karīm, Aiman ‘Abdul. “Dhikru Auhāmin Waqa’at Fī Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim Li Al-Ḥafiẓ Fatḥuddin Al-Ya’marī.” Journal of Sharia & Islamic Studies 34, no. 119 (December 2019): 161–91. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=awr&AN=141102507&site=ehost-live.

Kathīr (Ibn), Abū al-Fida>’ Isma>‘īl b. ‘Umar. Ikhtiṣār ‘Ulūm Al-Ḥadīth. Edited by Aḥmad Muḥammad Shākir. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, n.d.

_______. Al-Bidāyah wa al-Nihāyah. Dār al-Fikr, 1986.

Manan, Nuraini A. “Dinasti Saljuk Dalam Sejarah Peradaban Islam.” Jurnal Adabiya 20, no. 2 (July 17, 2018): 13–20. https://doi.org/10.22373/adabiya.v20i2.7432.

Maqdisī (al), Muḥammad Ṭāhir. Shurūṭ al-A’immah al-Sittah. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmīyah, 1984.

Mizzī (al), ‘Abd al-Raḥman. Tahdhīb al-Kamāl. Edited by Bashshār ‘Awad. Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Risālah, 1980.

Mu‘allimī (al), ‘Abd al-Raḥmān b. Yaḥyā. Al-Tankīl bi mā fī Ta’nīb al-Kawtharī min al-Abāṭīl. al-Maktab al-Islāmī, 1986.

Nabiel, Mohammad. Al-Bukhari Dan Metode Kritik Hadis (Telaah Historiografis Terhadap Para Periwayat Bermasalah Dan Persebaran Hadisnya Dalam Sahih Al-Bukhari). Edited by Mujiburrahman. Jakarta: el-Bukhori Institute, 2019.

Naysa>būrī (al), al-Ḥākim. Al-Mustadrak ‘alā al-Ṣaḥiḥayn. Edited by Muqabbal b. al-Hādī. Kairo: Dār al-Ḥaramayn, 1997.

Nasā’i (al), Abū ‘Abd al-Raḥman. Sunan al-Nasā’ī. Edited by ‘Abd al-Fatta>ḥ Abū Ghuddah. 2nd ed. Beirut: Maktab al-Maṭbū‘āt al-Islāmī, 1986.

Osman, Mohd Nor Adli bin, and Muhamad Rozaimi bin Ramle. “The Consistency of Ibn Ḥibbān to the Ḥujjiyyah Narrated by Al-Mudallīsīn in Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 26, no. 2 (July 2025): 498–521. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v26i2.5910.

Qasṭallānī (al), Shiha>b al-Dīn. Irshād al-Sārī li Sharḥ Ṣaḥīh al-Bukhārī. Mesir: al-Maṭba‘ah al-Kubrā al-Amīrīyah, 1905.

Qurṭubī (al), Sulayma>n b. Khalaf. Al-Ta‘dīl wa al-Tajrīh li man Khārraja lahū al-Bukhārī fī al-Jāmī‘ al-Ṣaḥīḥ. Edited by Abū Labābah Ḥusayn. Riyāḍ: Dār al-Liwā’, 1986.

Ramle, Muhammad Rozaimi, and Sahul Hamid Mohamed Maidin. “Ibn Hibban and the Mudallisin’s Narrations in His Book al-Sahih: Rule, Motive and Methodology.” Global Journal Al-Thaqafah 6, no. 1 (July 2016): 127–39. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT10920160601.

Rāzī (al), Ibn Abī Ḥātim. Al-Jarḥ wa al-Ta‘dīl. Hyderabad: Majlis Dā’irat al-Ma‘ārif al-‘Uthmānīyah, 1952.

Ṣaghānī (al), Muḥammad. Al-Mawḍū‘āt. Edited by Abū al-Fidā’. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmīyah, 1985.

Ṣalāḥ (al), Ṣiyānah Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Edited by Muwaffiq ‘Abdulla>h. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 1988.

Ṣalāḥ (al), Taqīy al-Dīn Ibn. Muqaddimah Ibn Ṣalāḥ. Edited by Nūruddīn ‘Itr. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1986.

Ṣarīfīnī (al), Taqīy al-Dīn. Al-Muntakhab min Kitāb al-Siyāq li Tārikh Naysābūr. Edited by Khālid Ḥaydar. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1993.

Sa‘īd (Ibn), Ṣālih. Al-Tadlīs wa Aḥkāmuh wa Āthāruh al-Naqdiyyah. 1st ed. Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 2002.

Sakhāwī (al), Shams al-Dīn. Fatḥ al-Mughīth bi Sharḥ Alfiah al-Ḥadīth. Miṣr: Maktabat al-Sunnah, 2003.

Salih, Maryam Sufian Sami, and Mazin Mizhir Ibrahim. “Examples of Errant Narrators According to Ibn Ḥibbān in His Work Al-Majrūḥīn: A Comparative Study.” Dragoman Journal, no. 17 (May 2025): 459–87. https://doi.org/10.63132/ati.2025.exampl.43328934.

Subkī (al), Tāj al-Dīn. Ṭabāqāt al-Shafi‘iyyah al-Kubrā. Edited by Maḥmūd Muḥammad and ‘Abd al-Fattāḥ. n.p.: Hajr, 1993.

Suyūṭī (al), Jalāl al-Dīn. Tadrīb al-Rāwī fī Sharḥ Taqrīb al-Nawāwī. Vol. 1. Kairo: Dār Ṭaybah, n.d.

Ya‘qub, Maḥmūd Aḥmad. “Al-Ruwwat alladhīna Itthamū bi al-Qadariyyah wa Tafarrada al-Bukhārī Aw Muslim bi al-Riwāyah.” ‘Ulūm al-Shari‘ah wa al-Qānūn 42, no. 3 (December 2015): 989–1005. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=awr&AN=114536607&site=ehost-live.

Yusoff, Muhammad Fawwaz Bin Muhammad, Nur Adlina Binti Zainal Abidin, Mohamad Khalid Bin Bahrudin, and Khadher Bin Ahmad. The Book of Knowledge in Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān: From Ḥadīth-Source Epistemology to Deontic Modals. July 30, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-20250173.

Zahrānī (al), Muḥammad b. Maṭar. Tadwīn al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah; Nash’atuh wa Ṭaṭuwwuruh min al-Qarn al-Ūlā ilā Nihāyah al-Qarn al-Tāsi‘ al-Hijrī. Riyāḍ: Dār al-Hijrah, 1996.

Zaylā’ī (al), Muḥammad. Naṣb al-Rāyah li Aḥādīth al-Hidāyah. Edited by Muḥammad Yusuf. Jeddah: Mu’assasat al-Rayyān, 1997.