Between Meccan Origins and Medinan Expansion: A Diachronic Reading of Secondary Embedding in Qs. Al-Muddaththir [74]: 31

Main Article Content

Muhammad Tajuddin
Muh. Awaluddin A
Bambang Sampurno
Basyir Arif

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of secondary embedding in the Qur’an, understood as the incorporation of Medinan material into surahs of Meccan provenance through a process of intra-textual development during the prophetic period. The case under consideration is Qs. al-Muddaththir [74]:31, a verse whose exceptional length constitutes a marked statistical departure from the otherwise compact rhythmic pattern of the surah. Drawing on Nicolai Sinai’s analytical framework and the principle of structural cohesion, this article argues that when the verse is analytically bracketed as a distinct literary layer, the thematic continuity of the surrounding passage remains intact, no discernible narrative gap emerges, and the surah’s overall rhythmic and structural balance is preserved. It is further proposed that the motive underlying this embedding is responsive in character, the verse appears to address dialogical concerns arising from the early audience’s engagement with the Qur’anic proclamation, while the phrase fī qulūbihim maraḍ aligns terminologically with vocabulary characteristic of the Medinan discursive context. This study contributes to the growing scholarly conversation on the dynamic textual development of the Qur’an, particularly as it pertains to surah structure and its relationship to the evolving social and theological horizons of the early Muslim community. It further offers a methodological contribution to the diachronic study of surah composition, demonstrating how structural and terminological analysis may illuminate the Qur’an’s responsive engagement with its formative historical context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Muhammad Tajuddin, Muh. Awaluddin A, Bambang Sampurno, & Basyir Arif. (2025). Between Meccan Origins and Medinan Expansion: A Diachronic Reading of Secondary Embedding in Qs. Al-Muddaththir [74]: 31. Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith, 15(2), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2025.15.2.60-85
Section
Articles

References

Ahmad, Hamdi Putra. “Thematic and Structural Unity of Q 79 (al-Nazi’at): An Intratextual and Intertextual Analysis”. QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies 4, no. 1 (2025): 41–58. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i1.6698.

Amini, Hanifah, Randy Putra Alamsyah, Dedi Masri, and Mariam Ahmed Zanan Alzahrani. “Rethinking the Qur’an’s Literary Evolution: Nicolai Sinai’s Approach to Inner-Qur’anic Chronology.” Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith 14, no. 2 (2024): 368-391. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2024.14.2.368-391.

Dye, Guillaume. “Concepts and Methods in the Study of the Qur’ān.” Religions 12, no. 8 (August 2021): 599, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12080599.

_______. “Ascetic and Nonascetic Layers in the Qur’an: A Case Study”. Numen 66, 5-6 (2019): 580-597. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685276-12341555.

Fajri, Muhammad. “Pemikiran Al-Qur’an Angelika Neuwirth dalam Structure and the Emergency of Community.” Al-Wajid: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Quran dan Tafsir 4, no. 1 (June 2023). https://doi.org/10.30863/alwajid.v4i1.5697.

Halevi, Leor. “Davids. Powers. Muhammad Is Not the Father of Any of Your Men: The Making of the Last Prophet. (Divinations: Rereading Late Ancient Religion.) Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 2009. Pp. Xvi, 357. $55.00.” The American Historical Review 116, no. 1 (February 2011): 246–47. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr.116.1.246-a.

Hartwig, Hirschfeld. New Research Into The Conposition And Exegesis of The Qur’an. London: Royal Asiatic Society, 1902.

Ḥijāzī (al), Muḥammad Mahmūd. Al-Tafsīr Al-Wāḍiḥ. Beirut: Dār al-Jīl al-Jadīd, 1993.

Little, Joshua J. “On the Historicity of ‘Uthmān’s Canonization of the Qur’an, Part 1: The State of the Field.” Journal of the International Qur’anic Studies Association 10, no. 1 (November 2025): 102–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/jiqsa-2025-0016.

Lüling, Günter. A Challange to Islam for Reformation: The Rediscovery and Reliable Reconstruction of A Comprehensive Pre-Islamic Christian Hymnal Hidden in The Koran Under Earliest Islamic Reinterpretation. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, 2003.

Neuwirth, Angelika. The Qur’an: Text and Commentary, Volume 1: Early Meccan Suras: Poetic Prophecy. Translated by Samuel Wilder. London: Yale University Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300232332.001.0001.

Nöldeke, Theodor, Friedrich Schwally, Gotthelf Bergsträßer, Otto Pretzl. The History of the Qur’ān. Edited and Translated by Wolfgang H. Behn. Leiden & Boston: Brill, 2013.

Powers, David S. Muhammad Is Not the Father of Any of Your Men: The Making of the Last Prophet. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812205572.

Reynolds, Gabriel Said. “Introduction: Qur’anic Studies and Its Controversies.” In The Qur’an in Its Historical Context, edited by Gabriel Said Reynolds, 1–26. London: Routledge, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203939604.

Rezk Elnemr, Mahmoud Ibrahim. “The Ideology and Translations of the Quran by the Orientalists: A Comparative Study of Richard Bells Translation.” Global Journal of Human-Social Science, December 31, 2020, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJHSSAVOL20IS20PG1.

Rippin, Andrew. “Academic Scholarship and The Qur’an.” In The Oxford Handbook of Qur’anic Studies. Edited by Mustafa Shah and Muhammad Abdel Haleem, 27-38. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199698646.001.0001.

Roth, Veronika. ‘1 Kings 22:19 - TUK_1088’, in Text from the World of the Qurʾān. edited by Michael Marx, with contributions by Sebastian Bitsch, Vasiliki Chamourgiotaki, Emmanouela Grypeou, Dirk Hartwig, Nestor Kavvadas, David Kiltz, Yousef Kouriyhe, Mohammed Maraqten, Adrian Pirtea, Veronika Roth, Johanna Schubert and Nicolai Sinai. Berlin: Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities. <https://corpuscoranicum.de/en/verse-navigator/sura/74/verse/31/intertexts/1088>

Rubenstein, Jay. “The Apocalypse of Empire: Imperial Eschatology in Late Antiquity and Early Islam by Stephen J. Shoemaker.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 28, no. 2 (2020): 335–37. https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.2020.0018.

Shahbah, Abū. Al-Madkhal Li Al-Dirāsah Al-Qur’ān Al-Karīm. Beirut: Dār al-Jīl al-Jadīd, 1992.

Shoemaker, Stephen J. The Death of a Prophet: The End of Muhammad’s Life and the Beginnings of Islam. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812205138.

Sinai, Nicolai. Fortschreibung Und Auslegung: Studien Zur Frühen Koraninterpretation. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2009.

_______. Processes of Literary Growth and Editorial Expansion in Two Medinan Surahs. In Islam and Its Past: Jahiliyah, Late Antiquity, and the Qur’an. Edited by Carol Bakhos and Michael Cook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198748496.003.0002.

_______. The Qur’an: A Historical-Critical Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.

_______. “The Qurʾān’s Dietary Tetralogue: A Diachronic Reconstruction.” Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 46 (2019): 113–46.

_______. “Toward a Redactional History of the Medinan Qur'an: A Case Study of Sūrat al-Nisāʾ (Q 4) and Sūrat al-Māʾidah (Q 5)”. In Structural Dividers in the Qur'an. Edited by Marianna Klar. London: Routledge, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003010456

_______. “Two Types of Inner-Qur’anic Interpretation.” In Exegetical Crossroads: Understanding Scripture in Judaism, Christianity and Islam in the Pre-Modern Orient, edited by Georges Tamer, Regina Grundmann, Assaad Elias Kattan, and Karl Pinggéra, 253–88. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110564341-013.

Sirry, Mun’im. Rekonstruksi Islam Historis: Pergumulan Kesarjanaan Mutakhir. Yogyakarta: Suka Press, 2021.

_______. “Introduction: Recent Trends in Qur’anic Studies.” In New Trends in Qur’anic Studies: Text, Context, and Interpretation. Edited by Mun‘im Sirry, 1-20. Atlanta, Georgia: Lockwood Press, 2019.

Tilawati, Anis. “Struktur Cincin dalam Al-Qur’an (Perspektif Orientalis - Nicolai Sinai).” Nun: Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Tafsir di Nusantara 4, no. 2 (September 2019): 51–77. https://doi.org/10.32495/nun.v4i2.67.

Zellentin, Holger. “Q 96 Sūrat Al-‘Alaq Between Philology and Polemics: A (Very) Critical Assessment of Günter Lüling’s Ur-Qur’ān.” In Die Koranhermeneutik von Günter Lüling, edited by Georges Tamer, 159–86. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110599176-010.