Religious Conversion in the Era of Cyber Proselytism in Indonesia: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Social Media Religious Content

Main Article Content

Loekisno Choiril Warsito
Le Ngoc Bich Ly

Abstract

The proliferation of social media has transformed online spaces into arenas of active religious persuasion, as evidenced by conversion movements organized around hashtags such as #hijrah and #SaveMaryam. This study addresses religious conversion in the era of cyber through a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of 68 purposively sampled content items drawn from Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, and WhatsApp, published between 2021 and 2025, encompassing both Islamic da’wa and Christian cyber evangelism. The analysis integrates Fairclough’s three-dimensional model, van Dijk’s socio-cognitive approach, and Wodak’s discourse-historical framework with digital religion theory and Rambo’s model of religious conversion. Four principal discursive strategies are identified: authenticity discourse; accessibility discourse; community discourse; and crisis discourse. These strategies constitute an integrated “persuasive ecology” in which each reinforces the others to address the cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions of religious persuasion simultaneously. The findings demonstrate that cyber proselytism is not traditional religious persuasion transposed into digital form but a qualitatively new discursive formation shaped by platform affordances and algorithmic logics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Warsito, L. C., & Ly, L. N. B. (2026). Religious Conversion in the Era of Cyber Proselytism in Indonesia: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Social Media Religious Content. Religió Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, 16(1), 112–145. https://doi.org/10.15642/religio.v16i1.4069
Section
Articles

References

“Digital 2024: Indonesia — DataReportal – Global Digital Insights.” Accessed March 2, 2026. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-indonesia.

Andok, Mónika. “The Impact of Online Media on Religious Authority.” Religions 15, no. 9 (2024): 1103. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091103.

Berger, Peter L. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. New York: Anchor Books, 1967.

Blommaert, Jan, and Chris Bulcaen. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” Annual Review of Anthropology 29, no. 1 (2000): 447–66. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447.

Bucher, Taina. If...Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.

Bunt, Gary R. Hashtag Islam: How Cyber-Islamic Environments Are Transforming Religious Authority. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2018.

Campbell, Heidi A. “Internet and Religion.” In The Handbook of Internet Studies, 1st ed., edited by Mia Consalvo and Charles Ess, 232–50. Wiley, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444314861.ch11.

———. “Looking Backwards and Forwards at the Study of Digital Religion.” Religious Studies Review 50, no. 1 (2024): 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsr.17062.

———. “Understanding the Relationship between Religion Online and Offline in a Networked Society.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 80, no. 1 (2012): 64–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfr074.

———, ed. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. London: Routledge, 2013.

Campbell, Heidi A., and Giulia Evolvi. “Contextualizing Current Digital Religion Research on Emerging Technologies.” Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2, no. 1 (2020): 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.149.

Campbell, Heidi A., and Forrest Rule. “The Practice of Digital Religion.” In Handbuch Soziale Praktiken und Digitale Alltagswelten, edited by Heidrun Friese, Marcus Nolden, Gala Rebane, and Miriam Schreiter, 345–53. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08357-1_38.

Campbell, Heidi A., and Mia Lövheim. “Introduction: Rethinking the Online–Offline Connection in the Study of Religion Online.” Information, Communication & Society 14, no. 8 (2011): 1083–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.597416.

Campbell, Heidi A., and Stephen Garner. Networked Theology: Negotiating Faith in Digital Culture. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2016.

Creswell, John W., and Cheryl N. Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. 4th ed. SAGE Publications, 2017.

Dijck, José van, Thomas Poell, and Martijn de Waal. The Platform Society. Oxford University Press, 2018.

Ding, Yidan, Yichen Xiao, Yumei Jiang, and Anhua Zhou. “The Mediatization of Religion: How Digital-Age Film and Television Reshape Interfaith Experiences.” Religions 16, no. 9 (2025): 1172. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16091172.

Eickelman, Dale F., and Jon W. Anderson, eds. New Media in the Muslim World: The Emerging Public Sphere. 2nd ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2003.

Evolvi, Giulia. “Hybrid Muslim identities in digital space: The Italian blog Yalla.” Social Compass 64, no. 2 (2017): 220–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768617697911.

Fairclough, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd ed. Routledge, 2023.

———. Discourse and Social Change. Polity, 1992.

———. Language and Power. Longman, 1989.

Gillespie, Tarleton. “The Relevance of Algorithms” in Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, edited by Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo J. Boczkowski, and Kirsten A. Foot, 167–194. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2014.

Gooren, Henri. Religious Conversion and Disaffiliation: Tracing Patterns of Change in Faith Practices. Palgrave Macmillan US, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113039.

Gorwa, Robert, Reuben Binns, and Christian Katzenbach. “Algorithmic Content Moderation: Technical and Political Challenges in the Automation of Platform Governance.” Big Data & Society 7, no. 1 (2020): 205395171989794. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945.

Guest, Greg, Arwen Bunce, and Laura Johnson. “How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability.” Field Methods 18, no. 1 (2006): 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903.

Hefner, Robert W. “Multiple Modernities: Christianity, Islam, and Hinduism in a Globalizing Age.” Annual Review of Anthropology 27, no. 1 (1998): 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.83.

Hew, Wai Weng. “The Art of Dakwah: Social Media, Visual Persuasion and the Islamist Propagation of Felix Siauw.” Indonesia and the Malay World 46, no. 134 (2018): 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2018.1416757.

Hjarvard, Stig. “The Mediatization of Religion: A Theory of the Media as Agents of Religious Change.” Northern Lights: Film & Media Studies Yearbook 6, no. 1 (2008): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1386/nl.6.1.9_1.

———. “Three Forms of Mediatized Religion: Changing the Public Face of Religion.” State Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide 38, no. 2 (2020): 21–43. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2020-38-2-41-75.

Karner, Tracy. “Salmons, Janet E., Doing Qualitative Research Online.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 42, no. 2 (2017): 215–18. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs29343.

Kholili, M., Ahmad Izudin, and Muhammad Lutfi Hakim. “Islamic Proselytizing in Digital Religion in Indonesia: The Challenges of Broadcasting Regulation.” Cogent Social Sciences 10, no. 1 (2024): 2357460. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2357460.

Kress, Gunther, and Theo Van Leeuwen. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2006.

Lewis R. Rambo, and Charles E. farhadIan. The Oxford handbook of Religious Conversion. Oxford University Press, 2014.Fair

Lofland, John, and Rodney Stark. “Becoming a World-Saver: A Theory of Conversion to a Deviant Perspective.” American Sociological Review 30, no. 6 (1965): 862. https://doi.org/10.2307/2090965.

Lövheim, Mia. Media, Religion and Gender: Key Issues and New Challenges. Media, Religion and Culture. Routledge, 2013.

Merriam, Sharan B., and Elizabeth J. Tisdell. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Fourth edition. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass, 2016.

Nisa, Eva F. “Social Media and the Birth of an Islamic Social Movement: ODOJ (One Day One Juz) in Contemporary Indonesia.” Indonesia and the Malay World 46, no. 134 (2018): 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2017.1416758.

Rambo, Lewis Ray. Understanding Religious Conversion. 2nd. Yale University Press, 1993.

Raya, Moch. Khafidz Fuad. “Digital Religion: The Packaging and Persuasion of Celebrity Preachers in Contemporary Indonesia.” Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 23, no. 67 (Spring 2024): 80–94. thenewjsri.ro.

Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge, 2001.

Scott, Susie. “Dramaturgical Traditions: Performance and Interaction.” In The Oxford Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, 1st ed., edited by Wayne H. Brekhus, Thomas DeGloma, and William Ryan Force. Oxford University Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190082161.013.6.

Setia, Paelani, and Mohammad Taufiq Rahman. “Socializing Religious Moderation and Peace in the Indonesian Landscape.” Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas 2, no. 3 (2022): 333–40. https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v2i3.17916.

Sito Rohmawati, Hanung, Zulkifli, and Nashrul Hakiem. “Mediatization and Hypermediation in Digital Religion and the Transformation of Indonesian Muslim Religious Practices through Social Media Usage.” Jurnal Sosiologi Agama 18, no. 2 (2025): 133–50. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsa.2024.182-01.

Slama, Martin. “A Subtle Economy of Time: Social Media and the Transformation of Indonesia’s Islamic Preacher Economy.” Economic Anthropology 4, no. 1 (2017): 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12075.

Turner, Victor. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1969.

Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Taufiqur Rahman, Frizki Yulianti Nurnisya, et al. “Hijrah and the Articulation of Islamic Identity of Indonesian Millenials on Instagram.” Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication 37, no. 2 (2021): 154–70. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2021-3702-10.

Van Dijk, Teun A. “Critical Discourse Analysis” in The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 1st ed., edited by Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin. Wiley, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22.

———. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. 1st ed. Communication. SAGE Publications, 1998.

———. “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society 4, no. 2 (1993): 249–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006.

Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. SAGE Publications, Ltd, 2001. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.

Yuliani, Ni Made. “Relasi Agama dan Media Digital Transformasi Otoritas Keagamaan Di Era Komunikasi Virtual.” Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu 10, no. 1 (2026): 104–16. https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v10i1.4942.

Zaluchu, Sonny Eli. “Theological Insight of Digital Religion.” Bogoslovni vestnik 83, no. 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.34291/BV2023/03/Zaluchu.

Zhang, Liang. “The Digital Age of Religious Communication: The Shaping and Challenges of Religious Beliefs through Social Media.” Studies on Religion and Philosophy 1, no. 1 (2025): 25–41. https://doi.org/10.71204/de63mn10.